Skip to main content

Table 2 Comparison of SRR between two groups

From: Testicular sperm aspiration has a poor effect in predicting micro-TESE outcomes in NOA patients with AZFc deletion

Subgroups

Group1 (n = 122)

Group2 (n = 59)

SRR

P

Testicular volume, n

 6 mL

30

17

63.8%

 

  ≥ 6 mL

92

42

68.7%

0.54

FSH, n

  < 11.1 mIU/mL

33

11

75.0%

 

 11.1–22.2 mIU/mL

59

29

67.0%

 

  ≥ 22.2 mIU/mL

30

19

61.2%

0.16

T, n

  < 8 nmol/L

37

19

66.1%

 

 8–12 nmol/L

50

26

65.8%

 

  ≥ 12 nmol/L

35

14

71.4%

0.56

LH, n

  < 6.8 mIU/mL

58

32

64.4%

 

  ≥ 6.8 mIU/mL

64

27

70.3%

0.40

  1. Chi-square test is used for comparison between rates
  2. Group1 Sperm obtained during micro-TESE, Group2 No sperm obtained during micro-TESE, FSH Follicle-stimulating hormone, LH Luteinizing hormone, T Testosterone, SRR Sperm retrieve rate
Back to article page

Basic and Clinical Andrology

ISSN: 2051-4190