Skip to main content

Table 1 Comparison of assays measuring sperm DNA fragmentation

From: Sperm DNA damage and its role in IVF and ICSI

Assay

Method of detection

Advantages

Disadvantages

SCD/Halo [20]

• Sperm loaded in agarose, denatured in acid solution, stained and observed with fluorescence microscopy for chromatin dispersion/halos.

• Sperm with nondispersed chromatin (ie small halos) have fragmented DNA.

• Interpreted as percentage of sperm with nondispersed chromatin.

• Commercial assay available

• Interpretation does not depend on fluorescence or flow cytometry

• Indirect assay only detects ssDNA breaks

• Involves acid denaturation

SCSA [21]

• Acid denaturation, then staining with acridine orange and measurement with flow cytometer.

• Green-staining sperm have intact DNA while red-staining sperm have denatured DNA.

• Interpreted as percentage of red-staining sperm (denatured sperm).

• Has extensive body of literature and established clinical thresholds

• Can be performed in fresh or frozen samples

• Proprietary protocol with no commercial assay available

• Indirect assay only detects ssDNA breaks

• Involves acid denaturation

Comet [26]

• With gel electrophoresis, fragmented DNA forms tail while intact DNA stays in head.

• Can be performed in alkaline or neutral conditions.

• Tail size correlates to amount of DNA fragmentation within individual spermatozoon.

• Interpreted as mean amount of DNA damage per individual spermatozoon.

• Requires small number of sperm cells

• Direct assay can examine damage at level of individual spermatozoon

• Can detect multiple types of DNA fragmentation

• No established standardized protocol

• Time and labour intensive

• Requires fresh semen sample

TUNEL [30]

• Labeled nucleotide added to sites of DNA fragmentation with subsequent fluorescence measured by flow cytometry or fluorescence microscopy.

• Fluorescent sperm have fragmented DNA.

• Interpreted as percentage of fluorescent sperm.

• Direct assay

• Commercial assay available

• Can be performed in fresh or frozen samples

• Detects ssDNA and dsDNA breaks

• No established standardized protocol

• Variable clinical thresholds in literature