Skip to main content
Download PDF

Amputation du gland au cours de la circoncision et réimplantation : à propos d’un cas et revue de la littérature

Glans penis amputation due to circumcision and replantation: case report and literature review

Basic and Clinical Andrology volume 21, pages 269–273 (2011)Cite this article

Résumé

L’amputation du gland au cours de la circoncision est une complication tragique dont la responsabilité incombe à l’opérateur. Le traitement de référence de cette lésion repose sur la réimplantation microchirurgicale par anastomose vasculaire et nerveuse. Nous rapportons un nouveau cas d’amputation totale du gland d’un enfant de six ans à la suite d’une circoncision et dont la réimplantation a été faite dans l’heure suivant l’accident, sans anastomose microchirurgicale. Avec un recul de plus de sept mois, le résultat obtenu a été jugé bon sur le plan urinaire et érectile de même que sur le plan de la sensibilité et de l’aspect cosmétique du gland.

Abstract

Penile amputation due to circumcision is a tragic complication in which the operator is responsible. The current treatment is based on microsurgical replantation methods by anastomosing penile dorsal vessels and nerves. We report a new case of penile glans amputation due to circumcision in a 6-year-old boy. Replantation was done without microvascular and nerves anastomosis. After 7 months of treatment, the final result was found to be good in terms of the urinary stream, erectile function, sensitivity and morphological aspect of the glans.

Références

  1. Aydin A, Aslan A, Tuncer S (2002) Penile amputation due to circumcision and replantation. Plast Reconstr Surg 110:707–708

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Babaei AR, Safarinejad MR (2007) Penile replantation, science or myth? A systematic review. Urol J 4:62–65

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Essid A, Hamzaoui M, Sahli S, et al (2005) Réimplantation balanique après accident de circoncision. Prog Urol 15:745–747

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hashem FK, Ahmed S, Al-Malaq AA, et al (1999) Successful replantation of penile amputation (postcircumcision) complicated by prolonged ischaemia. Br J Plast Surg 52:308–310

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sylla C, Diao B, Diallo AB, et al (2003) Les complications de la circoncision: à propos de 63 cas. Prog Urol 13:266–272

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chaim JB, Livne PM, Binyamini J, et al (2005) Complications of circumcision in Israel: a one year multicenter survey. Isr Med Assoc J 7:368–370

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mousavi SA, Salehifar E (2008) Circumcision complications associated with the plastibell device and conventional dissection surgery: a trial of 586 infants of ages up to 12 months. Adv Urol 606123

  8. Muula AS, Prozesky HW, Mataya RH, Ikechebelu JI (2007) Prevalence of complications of male circumcision in Anglophone Africa: a systematic review. BMC Urol 7:4

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Okeke LI, Asinobi AA, Ikuerowo OS (2006) Epidemiology of complications of male circumcision in Ibadan, Nigeria. BMC Urol 6:21

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sherman J, Borer JG, Horowitz M, et al (1996) Circumcision: successful glanular reconstruction and survival following traumatic amputation. J Urol 156:842–844

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sow Y, Diao B, Fall PA, et al (2007) Amputation du gland lors de la circoncision: à propos de 19 cas. Andrologie 17:236–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gluckman GR, Stoller ML, Jacobs MM, et al (1995) Newborn penile glans amputation during circumcision and successful reattachment. J Urol 153:778–779

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Faydaci G, Ugur K, Osman C, et al (2011) Amputation of glans penis: a rare circumcision complication and successful management with primary anastomosis and hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Korean J Urol 52:147–149

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Charlesworth P, Campbell A, Kamaledeen S, Joshi A (2011) Surgical repair of traumatic amputation of the glans. Urology 77:1472–1473

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CHR Amadou-Sakhir-MBaye de Louga, BP 586, Louga, Sénégal

    I. Diabaté

  2. CHR de Tambacounda, Tambacounda, Sénégal

    S. C. N. Kouka

Authors
  1. I. Diabaté
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. C. N. Kouka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to I. Diabaté.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Diabaté, I., Kouka, S.C.N. Amputation du gland au cours de la circoncision et réimplantation : à propos d’un cas et revue de la littérature. Basic Clin. Androl. 21, 269–273 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12610-011-0148-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12610-011-0148-x

Mots clés

  • Circoncision
  • Amputation
  • Pénis
  • Gland
  • Réimplantation pénienne

Keywords

  • Circumcision
  • Amputation
  • Penis
  • Glans
  • Penile replantation

Basic and Clinical Andrology

ISSN: 2051-4190