Skip to main content

Enfin, on parle du périnée chez l’homme: la distance anogénitale, un marqueur biologique de l’action des androgènes ?

Male perineum is alive, at last! Anogenital distance, a biological marker of androgen action?

Références

  1. 1.

    Salazar-Martinez E, Romano-Riquer P, Yanez-Marquez E, et al (2004) Anogenital distance in human male and female newborns: a descriptive, cross-sectional study. Environ Health 3:8

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Longnecker MP, Gladen BC, Cupul-Uicab LA, et al (2007) In utero exposure to the antiandrogen 1,1-dichloro-2,2-bis (p-chlorophenyl)ethylene (DDE) in relation to anogenital distance in male newborns from Chiapas, México. Am J Epidemiol 165:1015–1022

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Swan SH, Main KM, Liu F, et al (2005) Decrease in anogenital distance among male infants with prenatal phthalate exposure. Environ Health Perspect 113:1056–1061

    PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Hsieh MH, Breyer BN, Eisenberg ML, Baskin LB (2008) Associations among hypospadias, cryptorchidism, anogenital distance, and endocrine disruption. Curr Urol Rep 9:137–142

    PubMed  Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Thankamony A, Ong KK, Dunger DB, et al (2009) Anogenital distance from birth to 2 years: a population study. Environ Health Perspect 117:1786–1790

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Mieusset.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mieusset, R. Enfin, on parle du périnée chez l’homme: la distance anogénitale, un marqueur biologique de l’action des androgènes ?. Basic Clin. Androl. 21, 1–3 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12610-011-0120-9

Download citation