Skip to main content
  • Mise au Point
  • Published:

Prostatites: mise au point

Prostatitis: a review

Resume

Les prostatites sont des pathologies fréquentes. Elles apparaissent comme un groupe très hétérogène. Le diagnostic de prostatite aiguë a toujours été bien individualisé, alors que celui de prostatite chronique a toujours été beaucoup plus difficile.

La classification traditionnelle distingue les prostatites aiguës associant un syndrome infectieux général, accompagné d’une altération de l’état général, de troubles mictionnels et surtout, d’une prostate douloureuse au toucher rectal, et les prostatites chroniques regroupant toutes les autres pathologies associant des troubles mictionnels, des douleurs pelviennes ou périnéales ainsi qu’un éventuel écoulement urétra. Plus récemment, une classification plus objective, basée sur des critères histologiques et bactériologiques, reposant sur l’analyse des urines et du liquide prostatique a été proposée par le NIH (National Institutes of Health). Cette classification permet d’individualiser 4 cadres: prostatites bactériennes aiguës (catégorie 1), prostatites bactériennes chroniques (catégorie 2), prostatites non bactériennes (catégorie 3A), prostatodynies (catégorie 3B).

La nécessité d’un traitement bien conduit semble très importante pour éviter les récidives et le passage à la chronicité. La recherche d’une sténose de l’urètre est indispensable. La prise en charge des tableaux chroniques est plus difficile et impose une analyse bactériologique. Enfin il faut vérifier le statut androgénique du patient car tout déficit peut favoriser l’infection.

Abstract

Prostatitis is frequent and appears to corresponds to a very heterogeneous group of diseases. The diagnosis of acute prostatitis has always been well defined, while that of chronic prostatitis has always been much more difficult.

The conventional classification distinguishes acute prostatitis comprising a systemic infectious syndrome, accompanied by alteration of the general state, voiding disorders and especially a painful prostate on digital rectal examination, and chronic prostatitis corresponding to all other diseases associating voiding disorders, perineal or pelvic pain and possible urethral discharge. More recently, a more objective classification, based on bacteriological and histological criteria derived from analysis of urine and prostatic liquid was proposed by the NIH (National Institutes of Health). This classification defines 4 categories: acute bacterial prostatitis (category 1), chronic bacterial prostatitis (category 2), non-bacterial prostatitis (category 3A), prostatodynia (category 3B).

Well conducted treatment appears to be very important to prevent recurrence and the development of chronic prostatitis. The presence of an urethral stricture must be excluded. The management of chronic prostatitis is more difficult and requires bacteriological examination. Finally the patient’s androgen status must be verified, as androgen deficiency can promote infection.

References

  1. ARVIS G., SELLEM G.: Prostatites. In: Arvis G. ed. Andrologie. Paris, Maloine, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  2. BARTOOV B., OZBONFIL D., MAAYAN M.C., OHAD E., NITZAN Y.: Virulence characteristics of male genital tract Escherichia coli isola from semen of suspected infected men. Andrologia, 1991, 2: 387–394.

    Google Scholar 

  3. BATAINEH Z.M., BANI HANI I.H., AL-ALAMI J.R.: Zinc in normal and pathological human prostate gland. Saudi Med. J., 2002, 23: 218–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. DE BARBEYRAC B., BEBEAR C., MATHIEU C.: Inflammation de l’appareil génital masculin et reproduction: le point de vue du bactériologiste. Andrologie, 1998, 8: 245–253.

    Google Scholar 

  5. DENNIS L.K., LYNCH C.F., TORNER J.C.: Epidemiologic association between prostatitis and prostate cancer. Urology, 2002, 60: 78–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. DOBLE A.: An evidence-based approach to the treatment of prostatitis: is it possible? Curr. Urol. Rep., 2000, 1: 142–147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. FOWLER J.E. Jr., MARIANO M.: Difficulties in quantitating the contribution of urethral bacteria to prostatic fluid and seminal fluid cultures. J. Urol., 1984, 132: 471–473.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. HOLMÄNG S., MARIN P., LINDSTEDT G. et al.: Effect of long-term oral testosterone undecanoate treatment on prostate volume and serum prostate-specific antigen concentration in eugonadal middle-aged men. Prostate, 1993, 23: 99–106.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. HORCAJADA J.P., VILA J., MORENO-MARTINEZ A., RUIZ J., MARTINEZ J.A., SANCHEZ M., SORIANO E., MENSA J.: Molecular epidemiology and evolution of resistance to quinolones in Escherichia coli after prolonged administration of ciprofloxacin in patients with prostatitis. J. Antimicrob. Chemother., 2002, 49: 55–59.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. JIN B., TURNER L., WALTERS W.A. et al.: The effects of chronic high dose androgen or estrogen treatment on the human prostate. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab., 1996, 81: 4290–4295.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. KRIEGER J.N., RILEY D.E.: Prostatitis: what is the role of infection. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 2002, 19: 475–479.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. LEE J.C.: Microbiology of the prostate. Curr. Urol. Rep., 2000, 1: 159–163.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. MANGIN P., FOURNIER G.: Prostatites. Encycl. Méd. Chir. (Paris-France) 12-1988.

  14. MOLDWIN R.M.: Predictors of patient response to antibiotic therapy for the chronic prostatitis chronic pelvic pain syndrome: a prospective multicenter study. Curr. Urol. Rep., 2002, 3: 269–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. NABER K.G., BERGMAN B., BISHOP M.C. et al.: EAU guidelines for the management of urinary and male genital tract infections. Eur. Urol., 2001, 40: 576–588.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. POTTS J.M.: Diagnosing the prostatitis patient: the dilemma continues. Curr. Urol. Rep., 2002, 3: 319–322.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. REID G., SOBEL J.D.: Bacterial adherence in the pathogenesis of urinary tract infection: a review. Rev. Infect. Dis., 1987, 9: 470–487.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. ROBERTS R.O., JACOBSEN S.J.: Epidemiology of prostatitis. Curr. Urol. Rep., 2000, 1: 135–141.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. SCHOOR R.A.: Prostatitis and male infertility: evidence and links. Curr. Urol. Rep., 2002, 3: 324–329.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. SHOSKES D.A.: Phytotherapy and other alternative forms of care for the patient with prostatitis. Curr. Urol. Rep., 2002, 3: 330–334.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. WEIDNER W., DIEMER T., HUWE P., RAINER H., LUDWIG M.: The role of Chlamydia trachomatis in prostatitis. Int. J. Antimicrob. Agents, 2002, 19: 466–470.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jean-Louis Pariente.

Additional information

Edouard Amar, Pierre Bondil, Daniel Chevallier, Patrick Coloby, Pierre Costa, Florence Gour, Béatrice Cuzin, Dominique Delavierre, Manuel Demailly, Jean Philippe Dumas, Antoine Faix, François Giuliano, Jean Hermabessiere, Vincent Izard, Alain Jardin, Frédérique Kirsc-Noir, Michel Le Guillou, Philippe Mahe, Olivier Montaigne, Pierre Plante, Jean Marc Rigot, Dominique Rossi, Michel Schouman, Louis Sibert, Nicolas Thiounn, Laurent Wagner, Hervé Wallerand.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pariente, JL., Soyeur, L. & les membres du Comité d’Andrologie de L’Association Française d’Urologie. Prostatites: mise au point. Androl. 13, 445–451 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03035211

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03035211

Mots-clefs

Key Words