- Revue
- Elément Diagnostic de l’Infertilité
- Published:
Le test post coïtal à l’heure de l’AMP
Value of the post-coital test in the age of assisted reproductive technologies
Andrologie volume 15, pages 160–166 (2005)
Résumé
Ces dernières années, le développement considérable des techniques d’assistance médicale à la procréation (AMP) a modifié la prise en charge des couples infertiles, tant dans les possibilités thérapeutiques disponibles que dans l’évaluation diagnostique. Face aux taux de succès obtenus, la pratique des tests conventionnels est fréquemment mise en cause et notamment le test post coïtal (ou test de Hühner), qui fait l’objet d’opinions divergentes. Dans ce contexte, le but de cet article est de réévaluer l’intérêt du test post coïtal et de préciser son influence éventuelle dans la stratégie de prise en charge en Assistance Médicale à la Procréation des couples infertiles. Certaines situations clinico-biologiques justifient la pratique du test dans cette perspective de prise en charge, notamment pour diagnostiquer une infertilité d’origine cervicale, explorer une infertilité inexpliquée et mettre en évidence une pathologie du mouvement des spermatozoïdes
Abstract
The recent development of assisted reproductive technologies has greatly modified treatment and evaluation of infertility. In view of the high pregnancy rates obtained, the value of conventional diagnostic tests, especially the post-coital test, has become controversial.
Apart from differences in terms of standardization, the confusion concerning the diagnostic and prognostic value is largely due to the interpretation and the purpose of the test.
According to the World Health Organization guidelines, the post-coital test remains a reliable tool for the diagnosis of cervical infertility and sperm dysfunction, which is a possible cause of unexplained infertility. Over the last two cases, most other conventional tests have become inoperative and the results of the post-coital test may indicate the need for further investigations and may positively influence the treatment strategy.
References
ABU-HEIJA A.T., FLEMING R., JAMIESON M.E.: The effect of sperm-mucus interaction test on the outcome of in vitro fertilization and ovulation induction combined with intrauterin insemination. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. Res., 1996, 22: 229–233.
BALASCH J., JOVE I., BALLESCA J.L. et al.: Human in vitro fertilization in couples with unexplained infertility and a poor postcoital test. Gynecol. Endocrinol., 1989, 3: 289–295.
BALASCH J.: Investigation of the infertile couple: investigation of the infertile couple in the era of assisted reproductive technology: a time for reappraisal. Hum. Reprod., 2000, Nov. 15: 2251–2257.
BARRATT C.L., ST JOHN J.C.: Diagnostic tools in male infertility. Hum. Reprod., 1998, 13, Suppl. 1: 51–61.
BERBEROGLUGIL P., ENGLERT Y., VAN DEN BERGH M. et al.: Abnormal sperm-mucus penetration test predicts low in vitro fertilization ability of apparently normal semen. Fertil. Steril., 1993, 59: 1228–1232.
CHRETIEN F.C., GERNIGON C., DAVID G. et al.: The ultrastructure of human cervical mucus under scanning electron microscopy. Fertil. Steril., 1973, 24: 746–757.
CHRETIEN F.C.: The physiological importance of cervical secretion and its role in reproduction. Contracept. Fertil. Sex., 1979, 7: 31–41.
COX J.F., ZAVALA A., SARAVIA F. et al.: Differences in sperm migration through cervical mucus in vitro relates to sperm colonization of the oviduct and fertilizing ability in goats. Theriogenology, 2002, 58: 9–18.
DAVID G., FENEUX D., SERRES C. et al.: A new entity of sperm pathology: peri-axonemal flagellar dyskinesia. Bull. Acad. Natl. Med., 1993, 177: 263–271.
EGGERT-KRUSE W., KOHLERA A., ROHR G. et al.: The pH as an important determinant of sperm-mucus interaction. Fertil. Steril., 1993, 59: 617–628.
ESCALIER D., DAVID G.: Pathology of the cytoskeleton of the human sperm flagellum: axonemal and peri-axonemal anomalies. Biol. Cell., 1984, 50: 37–52.
FIVNAT: Bilan des tentatives 2001. Edition 2002, Organon en gynécologie.
GLAZENER C.M., FORD W.C., HULL M.G.: The prognostic power of the post-coital test for natural conception depends on duration of infertility. Hum. Reprod., 2000, 15: 1953–1957.
GLAZENER C.M., FORD W.C.: predicting conception. Hum. Fertil. (Camb), 2002, 5 (1 Suppl): S3–8.
HEIN M., VALORE E.V., HELMIG R.B. et al.: Antimicrobial factors in the cervical mucus plug. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2002, 187: 137–144.
HELMERHORST F.M., FINKEN M.J., ERWICH J.J.: Antisperm antibodies: detection assays for antisperm antibodies: what do they test? Hum. Reprod., 1999, 14: 1669–1671.
HJORT T.: Do autoantibodies to sperm reduce fecundity? A mini-review in historical perspective. Am. J. Reprod. Immunol., 1998, 40: 215–222.
HULL M.G., SAVAGE P.E., BROMHAM D.R.: Prognostic value of the postcoital test: prospective study based on time-specific conception rates. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1982, 89: 299–305.
HULL M.G., JOYCE D.N., MCLEOD F.N. et al.: Human in-vitro fertilisation, in-vivo sperm penetration of cervical mucus, and unexplained infertility. Lancet, 1984, 4 (8397): 245–246.
HULL M.G.: Infertility treatment: relative effectiveness of conventional and assisted conception methods. Hum. Reprod., 1992, 7: 785–796.
HUHNER M.: The Huhner test as a diagnosis of sterility due to necrospermia. J. Obstet. Gynec., 1937, 44: 334.
JOUANNET P., SEREES C.: Le mouvement du spermatozoïde humain. Bull. Acad. Natl. Med., 1998: 182: 1025–1034.
MENARGUEZ M., PASTOR L.M., ODEBLAD E.: Morphological characterization of different human cervical mucus types using light and scanning electron microscopy. Hum. Reprod., 2003, 9: 1782–1789.
OEI S.G., KEIRSE M.J., BLOEMENKAMP K.W. et al.: European postcoital tests: opinions and practice. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1995, 102: 621–624.
OEI S.G., HELMERHORST F.M., KEIRSE M.J.: When is the post-coital test normal? A critical appraisal. Hum. Reprod., 1995, 10: 1711–1714.
OEI S.G., BLOEMENKAMP K.W., HELMERHORST F.M. et al.: Evaluation of the postcoital test for assessment of ‘cervical factor’ infertility. Eur. J. Obstet. Gynecol. Reprod. Biol., 1996, 64: 217–220.
OEI S.G., HELMERHORST F.M., BLOEMENKAMP K.W. et al.: Effectiveness of the postcoital test: randomised controlled trial. Br. Med. J., 1998, 317: 502–505.
OLA B., AFNAN M., PAPAIOANNOU S. et al.: Accuracy of sperm-cervical mucus penetration tests in evaluating sperm motility in semen: a systematic quantitative review. Hum. Reprod., 2003, 5: 1037–1046.
OMBELET W., VANDEPUT H., JANSSEN M. et al.: Treatment of male infertility due to sperm surface antibodies: IUI or IVF? Hum. Reprod., 1997, 12: 1165–1170.
RANDALL J.M., TEMPLETON A.: Cervical mucus score and in vitro sperm mucus interaction in spontaneous and clomiphene citrate cycles. Fertil. Steril., 1991, 56: 465–468.
SCHATS R., AITKEN R.J., TEMPLETON A.A. et al.: The role of cervical mucus-semen interaction in infertility of unknown etiology. Br. J. Obstet. Gynaecol., 1984, 91: 371–376.
SERRES C., FENEUX D., JOUANNET P.: Abnormal distribution of the periaxonemal structures in a human sperm flagellar dyskinesia. Cell Motil. Cytoskeleton, 1986, 6: 68–76.
SIM J.M.: On the microscope, as an aid in the diagnosis and treatment from sterility. Med. J., 1869, 8: 393.
WAINER R., ALBERT M., DORION A. et al.: Influence of the number of motile spermatozoa inseminated and of their morphology on the success of intrauterine insemination. Hum. Reprod., 2004, 19: 2060–2065.
WHO World Health Organization laboratory manual for the examination of human semen and sperm-cervical mucus interaction. 4th edition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1999.
WOLF J.P., FENEUX D., ESCALIER D. et al.: Pregnancy after subzonal insemination with spermatozoa lacking outer dynein arms. J. Reprod. Fertil., 1993, 97: 487–492.
WOLF J.P., FENEUX D., DUCOT B. et al.: Influence of sperm movement parameters on human sperm-oolemma fusion. J. Reprod. Fertil., 1995, 105: 185–192.
WOLF J.P., DE ALMEIDA M., DUCOT B. et al.: High levels of sperm-associated antibodies impair human sperm-oolemma interaction after subzonal insemination. Fertil. Steril., 1995, 63: 584–590.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Albert, M. Le test post coïtal à l’heure de l’AMP. Androl. 15, 160–166 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03035148
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03035148