Skip to main content
  • La Part du Mâle dans les Avortements Spontanés à Répétition
  • Published:

Importance de la qualité du sperme

Sperm quality in repeated spontaneous abortion (RSA)

Abstract

The semen quality and sperm chromatin alteration have added a new dimension to the evaluation of male factors in repeated spontaneous abortion (RSA). The aim of the study was to evaluate the importance of the sperm quality in RSA conjugal partners.

In RSA group, when husbands sperm having more 50% of normal forms and more 50% of native DNA, the paternal lymphocytes injection may lead to a positive immunization. However, no benefit of immunotherapy between conjugal partners if the conventional semen parameters and chromatin quality were altered.

Our data indicates that among the vast array of male factors, sperm morphology and chromatin quality seems to be an important criterion to conceive or maintain pregnancy of women with a RSA.

Bibliographie

  1. Bordson B.L., Leonardo V.S. The appropriate upper age limit for semen donors: a review of the genetic effects of paternal age. Fertil. Steril. 1991 ; 56: 397–401.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Martin R.H., Rademaker A.W. The effects of age on the frequency of sperm chromosomal abnormality in normal men. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1987; 41: 484.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hook E.B., Schreinemachers D.M., Willey A.M., Cross P.K. Inherited structural cytogenetic abnormalities detected incidentally in fetuses diagnosed prenatally: frequency, parental age associations, sex ratio trends and comparisons with rates of mutants. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 1984; 48: 129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Cohen J. La maladie abortive: Nouvelles perspectives. Gynecologie. 1987; 38: 334–336.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Friedman J.M. Genetic disease in the offspring of older fathers. Obstet. Gynecol. 1981; 57: 745–748.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Vogel F., Rathenberger R. Spontaneous mutation in man. Adv. Hum.Genet. 1975;5:223.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lian Z.H., Zack M.M., Erickson J.D. Paternal age and the occurence of birth defects. Am. J. Genet. 1986; 39: 148.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Bourrouillou G., Dastague N., Colombies P. Chromosome studies in 952 infertilemales with a sperm count below 10 millions / ml. Hum. Genet. 1985; 71: 366–367.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Martin-Du-Pan R.C., Dahoun S. Rôle du facteur masculin dans les avortements àrépétition. J. Gynécol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 1992; 21: 739–742.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Boué J., Boué A., Lazar P. Retrospective and prospective epidemiological studies of 1500 karyotypes in spontaneous human abortions. Teratology. 1975; 12: 11–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Courot M., Fournier-Delpech S., Colas G. Spermatozoïdes et mort foetale. Actualités gynécol., A. Netter, A. Gorins, 1980; 1–9. ed. MASSON. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Carré-Pigeon F., Teyssier J.R., Gaillard D., Bajolle F., Melin M.C. Intérêt d’une étude méiotique dans les stérilités masculines. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 1987; 16: 877–885.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pellestor F., Sele B. Etude cytogénétique du sperme humain. Médecine Sciences. 1989; 5: 244–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Margalioth E.J., Naudt D., Laufer N., et all Correlation between the zona-free hamster egg sperm penetration assay and human in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 1986; 45: 645–670.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koulischer L., Schoysman R. Génétique et fausses-couches à répétition. Actualités gynécol., A. Netter, A. Gorins. 1980; 11–19. éd. MASSON. Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Joël C.A. The role of spermatozoa in habitual abortion. Fertil. Steril. 1955; 6: 459–464.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Macleod J., Gold R.Z. The Male factor in fertility and infertility, IX. Semen quality in relation to accidents of pregnancy. Fertil. Steril. 1957; 8: 36–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Bacz A. The early pregnancy: a role of male factor. Eur. J. Obstet. Gyn. Reprod. Biol. 1987; 24: 126–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Polansky F.F., Lamb E.J. Do the result of semen analysis predict the future fertility? A survival analysis study. Fertil. Steril. 1988; 49: 1059–1065.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kruger T.F., Acosta A.A., Simmons K.F., Swanson R.J., Matta J.F., Oehninger S. Predictive value of abnormal sperm morphology in in vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 1988; 49: 112–117.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Oehninger S., Acosta A.A., Morshedi M., Veeck L., Swanson R.J., Simmons K., Rosenwaks Z. Corrective measures and pregnancy outcome in in vitro fertilization in patients with severe sperm morphology abnormalities. Fertil. Steril. 1988; 50: 283–287.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grillo J.M. Fécondance du sperme. J. Gynecol. Obstet. Biol. Reprod. 1991; 20: 19–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Witkin S.S., David S.S. Effect of sperm antibodies on pregnancy outcome in a subfertile population. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 1988; 158: 59–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haas G., Kubota et al. Circulating antisperm antibodies in recurrently aborting women. Fertil. Steril 1986; 45: 209–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Witkin S.S., Chaudhry A. Association between recurrent spontaneous abortions and circulating IgG antibodies to sperm tails in women. J. Reprod. Immunol. 1989; 15: 151–158.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chong X.U., Fu C., Li L et al. Antisperm antibody, a causal factor of spontaneous abortion? J. Androl. 1990; 11: 36 P Abstr. 61.

  27. Mathur S., Neff M.R., Williamson H.O., Genco P.V., Rust P.F., Glassman A.B. Sperm antibodies and human leucocyte antigens in couples with early spontaneous abortions. Int. J. Fertil. 1987; 32: 59–65.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Orgebin-Crist M.C., Jahao N. Delayed clivage of rabbit ova after fertilization by young epididymal spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod. 1977; 16: 338–362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Fournier-Delpech S., Colas G., Courot M., Ortavant R., Brice G. Epididymal maturation in the ram: motility, fertilizing ability and embryonnic survival after uterine artificial insemination in the ewe. Ann. Biol. Bioch. Biophys. 1979; 19: 597–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Dadoune J.P. Modifications nucléaires des spermatides et des spermatozoïdes. Evaluation de la maturité nucléaire. Contr. Fertil. Sex. 1991; 19: 833–839.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Royère D. Evolution de l’état de condensation de la chromatine du spermatozoïde: Relation avec le pouvoir fécondant. Contr. Fertil. Sex. 1989; 17: 638.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lescoat D., Colleu D., Boujard P, Le Lannou D. Electrophoretic characteristics of the nuclear proteins from human spermatozoa. Arch. Androl. 1988; 20: 35–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Le Lannou D. Evaluation de la maturité du noyau du spermatozoïde humain et qualité embryonnaire. Contr. Fertil. Sex. 1989; 17: 641–642.

    Google Scholar 

  34. Hamamah S., Royere D., Nicolle J.C., Paquignon M., Lansac J. Effects of freezing-thawing on the spermatozoon nucleus: a comparative chromatin cytophotometric study in the porcine and human species. Reprod. Nutr. Dev. 1990; 30: 59–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Le Lannou D., Blanchard Y. Nuclear maturity and morphology of human spermatozoa selected by percoll density gradient centrifugation or swim-up procedure. J. Reprod. Fert. 1988; 84: 551–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Evenson D.P., Jost K.L., Baer A.K., Turner T.W., Schrader S.M. Individuality of DNA denaturation patterns in human sperm as measured by the sperm chromatin structure assay. Reprod. Toxicol. 1991; 5: 115–125.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Ibrahim M.E., Moussa M.A., Pedersen H. Sperm chromatin heterogeneity as an infertility factor. Arch. Androl. 1988; 21: 129–133.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Jager S. Sperm nuclear stability and male infertility. Arch. Androl. 1990; 25: 253–259.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hamamah, S., Fignon, A. Importance de la qualité du sperme. Androl. 6, 16–23 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03035064

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03035064

Key-words