- Diagnostic Pré-Implantatoire (DPI)
- Published:
Le diagnostic génétique pré-implantatoire: premier bilan du groupe parisien
Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: update
Andrologie volume 13, pages 259–264 (2003)
Resume
Le travail rapporte l’expérience parisienne du diagnostic génétique pré-implantatoire (DPI). 59 couples ont été pris en charge de janvier 2000 à juillet 2001 au cours de 71 cycles. Les ovocytes recueillis ont été inséminés par injection intracytoplasmique de spermatozoïde et les embryons biopsiés au troisième jour de développement. L’analyse génétique a été effectuée le jour de la biopsie et la majorité des transferts embryonnaires effectués le quatriéme jour post fécondation. Au cours des 71 cycles, 872 ovocytes ont été recueillis dont 731 étaient compatibles avec une injection intracytoplasmique de spermatozoïde. Parmi les 505 embryonds obtenus, 421 embryons ont été biopsiés et un résultat génétique a été obtenu pour 312 (74%) d’entre eux. 127 embryons ont été transférés au cours de 58 transferts. 18 grossesses biologiques et 12 cliniques ont été obtenues (7 uniques, 4 gémellaires et une triple). 16 enfants sont nés. Le DPI prend désormais sa place parmi les choix proposés aux couples à risque de transmission de maladie génétique de particulière gravité et incurable au moment du diagnostic.
Abstract
This paper reports the birth of the first fourteen infants conceived after preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) in our unit. Fifty-nine couples were enrolled between January 2000 and July 2001. They had a total of 71 oocyte pick-up cycles. The collected oocytes were inseminated by intracytoplasmic sperm injection. The resulting embryos were biopsied on the third day of development and genetic analysis was performed on the same day. Most of the embryo transfers were carried out on the fourth day. The 71 oocyte pick-up cycles yielded 872 oocytes of which 731 were suitable for intacytoplasmic sperm injection. Among the 505 embryos obtained, 421 embryos were biopsied and genetic diagnosis was performed for 312 (74%) of them. 127 embryos were transferred during 58 transfer procedures. There were 18 biochemical and 12 ongoing (7 singles, 4 twins and 1 triple) pregnancies. Sixteen infants have been born and 2 are expected. PGD now constitutes an alternative for couples at risk of transmission of a serious and incurable genetic disease.
References
ESHRE PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS (PGD) CONSORTIUM: Preliminary assessment of data from January 1997 to September 1998 ESHRE PGD Consortium Steering Committee. Hum. Reprod., 1999, 14: 3138–3148.
ESHRE PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS (PGD) CONSORTIUM: Data collection II (May 2000). Hum. Reprod., 2000, 15: 2673–2683.
ESHRE PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS (PGD) CONSORTIUM: Data collection III. Hum. Reprod., 2002, 1: 233–246.
FINDLAY I., MATTHEWS P.L., MULCAHY B.K., MITCHELSON K.: PCR to diagnose multiple defects from single cells: implications for PGD. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol., 2001, 183 suppl 1: S5-S12.
GEKAS J., THEPOT F., TURLEAU C. et al.: Chromosomal factors of infertility in candidate couples for ICSI: an equal risk of constitutional aberrations in women and men. Hum. Reprod., 2001, 16: 82–90.
GIANAROLLI L., MAGLI M.C., FERRARETTI A.P.: Thein vivo andin vitro efficiency and efficacy of PGD for aneuploidy. Mol. Cell. Endocrinol., 2001, 183 supl 1: S13-S18.
GRIFFIN D.K., HANDYSIDE A.H., PENKETH R.J., WINSTON R.M., DELHANTY J.D.: Fluorescentin situ hybridation to interphase nuclei of human preimplantation embryos with X and Y chromosome specific probes. Hum. Reprod., 1991, 6: 101–105.
GRIFFIN D.K., HANDYSIDE A.H., HARPERT J.C. et al.: Clinical experience with preimplantation diagnosis of sex by dual fluorescentin situ hybridization. J. Assist. Reprod. Genet., 1994, 11: 132–143.
HANDYSIDE A., LESKO J., TARIN J., WINSTON R., HUGUES M.: Birth of a normal girl after in vitro fertilization and preimplantation diagnostic testing for cystic fibrosis. N. Engl. J. Med., 1992, 327: 905–909.
KNIGHT S.J., LESE C.M., PRECHT K.S. et al.: An optimized set of human telomere clones for studying telomere integrity and architecture. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 2000, 67: 320–332.
LIU J., LSSENS W., SILBER S.J., DEVROEY P., LIBAERTS I., VAN STEIRTHEGEM A.: Birth after preimplantation diagnosis of the cystic fibrosis ΔF508 mutation by polymerase chain reaction. J. Am. Med. Ass., 1994, 272: 1858–1860.
MESCHEDE D., LEMCKE B., EXELER J.R. et al.: Chromosome abnormalities in 447 couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection—prevalence, types, sex distribution and reproductive relevance. Hum. Reprod., 1998, 13: 576–582.
RAY P., GIGAREL N., BONNEFONT J.P. et al.: First specific PGD for ornithine transcarbanylase deficiency. Pren. Diagn., 2000, 20: 1048–1054.
RAY P.F., MUNNICH A., NISAND I., FRYDMAN R., VEKEMANS M., VIVILIE S.: The place of “social sexing” in medicine and science. Hum. Reprod., 2002, 17: 248–249.
SCRIVEN P.N., HANDYSIDE A.H., OGILVIE C.M.: Chromosome translocations: segregation modes and strategies for preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Prenat. Diagn., 1998, 18: 1437–1449.
STROM C.M., STROM S., LEVINE E., GINSBERG N., BARTON J., VERLINSKY Y.: Obstetric outcomes in 102 pregnancies after preimplantation genetic diagnosis. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol., 2000, 182: 1629–1632.
TARIN J.J., HANDYSIDE A.H.: Embryo biopsy strategies for preimplantation diagnosis. Fertil. Steril., 1993, 59: 943–952.
VAN DER VEN K., PESCHKA B., MONTAG M., LANGE R., SCHWANITZ G. VAN DER VEN H.H.: Increased frequency of congenital chromosomal aberrations in female partners of couples undergoing intracytoplasmic sperm injection. Hum. Reprod., 1998, 13: 48–54.
WILTON L., WILLIAMSON R., McBAIN J., VOULLAIRE L.: Use of comparative genomic hybridization to karyotype embryos prior to implantation: the achievement of a successful pregnancy. Hum. Reprod., 2001, 16: abstract book 1, 33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Achour-frydman, N., Tachdjian, G., Ray, P. et al. Le diagnostic génétique pré-implantatoire: premier bilan du groupe parisien. Androl. 13, 259–264 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03034880
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03034880