Skip to main content

Examen ultrastructural quantitatif des spermatozoides humains: Intérêt, méthode, valeurs de référence, indications

Quantitative ultrastructural analysis of human spermatozoa: Revelance, method, reference values, indications

Abstract

The use of transmission electron microscopy in clinical andrology is complicated by problems of classification and interpretation related to the extraordinary pleomorphism of human spermatozoa, even in fertile men. Based upon our experience of more than 650 cases, this paper describes the morphological abnormalities seen and proposes a simplified classification which is the basis of our approach to the quantitative ultrastructural assessment of human spermatozoa. The mean and maximum incidences of the various abnormalities are provided for 37 fertile ejaculates. These reference values, particularly the threshold value of 50% abnormal acrosomes, constitute our interpretation criteria. Finally, the indications for this type of extended evaluation are defined as unexplained (idiopathic) infertility, severe asthenozoospermia, and teratozoospermia characterized by a high level of abnormal heads.

Resume

L’utilisation de la microscopie électronique à transmission en clinique andrologique se heurte à des difficultés de classification et d’interprétation liées à l’extraordinaire pléiomorphisme caractérisant les spermatozoïdes humains et ce, même chez les sujets fertiles. Forts d’une expérience portant sur plus de 650 cas, nous donnons ici une description des malformations observées et proposons la classification simplifiée servant de base à notre méthodologie d’examen ultrastructural quantitatif du sperme humain. Nous rapportons les fréquences moyennes et maximales de ces malformations dans 37 spermes fertiles. Ces valeurs de référence et notamment la valuer seuil de 50% d’acrosomes anormaux constituent nos critères d’interprétation. Nous précisons, enfin, les indications de ce type d’exploration approfondie à savoir: les infertilités inexpliquées, les asthénozospermies sévères et les tératozoospermies caractérisées par un taux élevé de têtes anormales

References

  1. 1

    -Afzelius B. Electron microscopy of the spermtail. Results obtained with a new fixative. J. Biophysic. Biochem. Cytol., 1959, 5:269–278.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2

    -Albert A, Lesaffre E. Multiple group logistic discrimination. Comp. Maths with Appls, 1986, 12A:209–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3

    -Baccetti B, Burrini AG, Maver A, Pallini V, Renieri T. “9+0” Immotile spermatozoa in an infertile man. Andrologia, 1979, 11:437–443.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4

    -Baccetti B., Burrini AG., Collodel G., Magnono AR., Piomboni P., Renieri T., Sensini C. Crater defect in human spermatozoa. Gamete Res., 1989, 22:249–255.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5

    -Baccetti B., Burrini A.G., Collodel G., Piomboni P., Renieri T.A. “Miniacrosome” sperm defect causing infertility in two brothers. J. Androl., 1991, 12: 104–111.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. 6

    -Barlow P., Englert Y., Puissant F., Lejeune B., Delvigne A., Van Rysselberge M., Leroy F. Fertilization failure in IVF: why and what next? Human Reprod., 1990, 5:451–456.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7

    -Bartoov B., Eltes F., Weissenberg R., Lunenfeld A. Morphological characterization of abnormal human spermatozoa using TEM. Arch. Androl., 1980, 5:305–322.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8

    -Bisson JP., David G. Anomalies morphologiques du spermatozoïde humain. 2) Etude ultrastructurale. J. Gyn. Obst. Biol. Repr., Suppl., 1975, 1:37–86.

    Google Scholar 

  9. 9

    -Bisson JP., Leonard C., David G. Caractère familial de certaines perturbations morphologiques des spermatozoïdes. Arch. Anat. Cytol. Path., 1979, 27:230–233.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10

    -Bower L., Serafini P., Wikland M., Moyer D. The use of hyaluronic acid for sperm selection— Evaluation of sperm head ultrastructure. Int. J. Fertil., 1989, 34:420–424.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. 11

    -Carlon N., Navarro A., Pizant J. Etude ultrastruturale quantifiée du sperme dans 72 cas d’infcondité masculine. Contracept. Fertil. Sex., 1991, 19:985–993.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12

    -Chemes HE, Carizza C., Scarinci F., Brugo S., Neuspiller N., Schwarstein T. Lack of a head human spermatozoa from sterile patients: a syndrome associated with impaired fertilization. Fertil. Steril., 1987, 47:310–316.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13

    -Cohen J., Edwards R., Fehily C., Eishel S., Hewitt J., Purdy J., Rowland G., Steptoe P., Webster J. In vitro fertilization: a treatment for male infertility. Fertil. Steril., 1985, 43:422–432.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14

    -David G., Bisson JP., Czyglik F., Jouanne P., Gernigon C. Anomalies morphologiques du spermatozoïde humain. 1) Proposition pour un système de classification. J. Gyn. Obst. Biol. Repr. Suppl., 1975, 4: 17–36.

    Google Scholar 

  15. 15

    -David G., Escalier D. Apport de la microscopie électronique à l’examen du sperme. In: A la recherche du pouvoir fécondant du sperme. Schoysman R (eds), 2ème Congrès de la S.A.L.F., Bruxelles, 1897, 57–65.

  16. 16

    -Escalier D., Bisson JP.. Quantitative ultrastructural modifications in human spermatozoa after freezing. In: Human artificial insemination and semen preservation. David G. and Price WS. (eds), Plenum Press (New York), 1980, 107–122.

    Google Scholar 

  17. 17

    -Escalier D. Human spermatozoa with large heads and multiple flagella: quantitative ultrastructural study of 6 cases. Biol. Cell., 1983, 48:65–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. 18

    -Escalier D., David G. Pathology of the cytoskeleton of the human sperm flagellum: Axonemal and periaxonemal anomalies. Biol. Cell., 1984, 50:37–52.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. 19

    -Fawcett DW. Review Article. The mammalian spermatozoon. Dev. Biol., 1975, 44:394–436.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. 20

    -Jeyendran RS, Van der Ven HH., Kennedy WP., Perez-Pelaes M., Sobrero AJ., Zaneveld LJD. Acrosomeless sperm. A cause of primary male infertility. Andrologia, 1985, 17:31–36.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. 21

    -Mashiach R., Fisch B., Eltes F., Tadir Y., Ovadia J., Bartoov B. The relationship between sperm ultrastructural features and fertilizing capacity in vitro. Fertil. Steril., 1992, 57:1052–1057.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. 22

    -Navarro A., Pizant J., Carlon N. Ultrastructure of spermatozoa in unexplained failure of IVF. Mol. Androl, 1992, 4:72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  23. 23

    -Pedersen H. Ultrastructure of the ejaculated human sperm. Z. Zellforsch., 1969, 94:542–554.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. 24

    -Pedersen H., Rebbe H. Absence of arms in the axoneme of immobile human spermatozoa. Biol. Reprod., 1975, 12:541–544.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. 25

    -Plachot M., Mandelbaum J., Junca AM., Moyens actuels d’évaluation de la fécondance du sperme. Contracep. Fertil. Sexualité, 1986, 14:211–219.

    Google Scholar 

  26. 26

    -Raick D. Détermination et évaluation quantitative de critères ultrastructuraux permettant une esti mation du pouvoir fécondant des permatozoïdes humains. Doctorat en Sciences Biomédicales Expérimentales, Universités Lièges, 1991, 207

  27. 27

    -Raick D., Baeckeland E., Letawe J. A quantitative study of ultrastructural spermatozoa defects in relation with infertility. Prog. Reprod. Biol. Med. Basel, Karger, 1992, 15 194–201.

    Google Scholar 

  28. 28

    -Raick D., Baeckeland E. Predictive value of electron microscopy of sperm for IVF. Mol. Androl., 1992, 4:72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  29. 29

    -Renieri T.. Submicroscopal observations on abnormal human spermatozoa. J. Submicr. Cytol., 1974, 6:421–432.

    Google Scholar 

  30. 30

    -Serafini P., Hauser D., Moyer D., Marrs RP. Cryopreservation of human spermatozoa: correlations of ultrastructural sperm head configuration with sperm motility and ability to penetrate zona free hamster ova. Fertil. Steril., 1986, 46:691–695.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31

    -Zamboni L. The ultrastructural pathology of the the spermatozoon as a cause of infertility: the role of electron microscopy in the evaluation of semen quality. Fertil. Steril., 1987, 48:711–734.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32

    -Zukerman Z., Sagiv M., Ravid A., Ben-Bassat M., Malik Z., Shohat B., Tadir Y., Ovadia Y., Singer R. A high proportion of double-headed and double-tailed sperm in semen of a human male. A case report. Andrologia, 1986, 18: 495–501.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Raick-Mignolet.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Raick-Mignolet, D., Baeckeland, E. Examen ultrastructural quantitatif des spermatozoides humains: Intérêt, méthode, valeurs de référence, indications. Androl. 2, 114–120 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03034687

Download citation

Key words

  • Human spermatozoa
  • Ultrastructure
  • Male infertility

Mots clés

  • Spermatozoïde humain
  • Ultrastructure
  • Infertilité masculine