Skip to main content

La réaction acrosomique

The acrosome reaction. Review of the different methods of evaluation and teh interest of acrosomal investigation

Revue bibliographique des techniques de détection et intérêt de l’exploration acrosomique

Resume

La capacité des spermatozoïdes à accomplir la réaction acrosomique (RA) au contact de la membrane pellucide de l’ovocyte représente une fonction essentielle pour la réalisation de la fécondation. Plusieurs méthodes sont disponibles pour évaluer le statut acrosomique; chaque méthode détecte une étape de la réaction qui est un processus continu. La multiplicité et la relative spécificité des différentes techniques rendent délicate la comparaison des résultats en valeur absolue.

La réaction est Ca++ dépendante d’où l’intérêt pour l’utilisation des ionophores calciques. Ils permettent une étude dynamique qui donne une meilleure appréciation de la capacité des spermatozoïdes à réagir en présence d’un inducteur.

Compte tenu de l’importance de cette réaction pour la réussite de la fécondation, plusieurs équipes ont cherché à corréler le statut acrosomique avec le pouvoir fécondant des spermatozoïdes. Les résultats montrent que les spermatozoïdes hypofécondants manifestent une réponse diminuée à l’induction de la RA.

Des travaux systématiques avec un protocole bien défini semble nécessaires pour pouvoir comparer des résultats multicentriques et établir la valeur pronostique de cet examen.

Abstract

The acrosome reacting capacity of spermatozoa is essential for the fertilization of the oocyte. Several methods are available for the evaluation of the acrosomal status; each method detects a step of the reaction which is a continuous process. Due to the diversity and the relative specificity of each technique, it is difficult to compare results in absolute values.

The reaction is Ca++ dependent. The use of Ca++ ionophores is valuable for a dynamic study which gives a better appreciation of the capacity of spermatozoa to react to a specific stimulus.

Many authors have attempted to correlate the acrosomal status to the fertilizing ability of spermatozoa. The results show a reduced induction of AR in hypofertile sperm.

More studies with standard materials and methods are needed in order to confirm the diagnostic value of this test.

Bibliographie

  1. 1.

    AUSTIN CR.: Observations on the penetration of sperm into the mammalian egg. Aust. J. Sci. Res., 1951, B.4: 581–596.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    CHANG MC.: Fertilizing capacity of sperm, deposited in the fallopian tubes. Nature, 1951, 168: 697–698.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    LANGLAIS J, ROBERTS KD.: A molecular membrane model of sperm capacitation and the acrosome reaction of mammalian spermatozoa. Gam. Res. 1985, 12: 183–224.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    TESARIK J. From the cellular to the molecular dimension: the actual challenge for human fertilization research. Gam. Res. 1986, 13: 47–89.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    KOEHLER JK.: Surface alteration during the capacitation of mammalian spermatozoa. Am. J. Primatol. 1981: 131–141.

  6. 6.

    AGUAS AP, PINTO da SILVA P.: Regionalisation of transmembrane glycoproteins in the plasma membrane of boar sperm head is revealed by fracture-label. J. Cell. Biol. 1983, 97: 1356–1364.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    AGUAS AP, PINTO da SILVA P.: High density of transmembrane glycoproteins on the flagellar surface of boar sperm cells. J. Cell. Biol. 1984, 99: 655–660.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    KOEHLER JK.: Human sperm head ultra-structure: A freeze- etching study. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 1972, 39: 520–539.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    TESARIK J.: Topographical relationship of intramembrane particle distribution patterns in human sperm membranes. J. Ultrastruct. Res. 1984, 89: 42–55.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    KOEHLER JK, De CURTIS I, STENCHEVER MA, SMITH D.: Interaction of human sperm with zona-free hamster eggs. Gamete Res. 1982, 6: 371–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    DAVIS BK.: Timing of fertilization in mammals: Sperm cholesterol/phospholipid ratio as a determinant of the capacitation interval. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1981, 78: 7560–7564.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    DAVIS BK.: Uterine fluid proteins bind sperm cholesterol during capacitation in the rabbit. Experientia, 1982, 38: 1063–1064.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    AITKEN RJ, WANG YF, LUI J, BEST F, RICHARDSON DW.: The influence of medium composition, osmolarity and albumin content on the acrosome reaction and fertilizing capacity of human spermatozoa: development of an improved zona-free hamster egg penetration test. Int. J. Androl. 1983, 6: 180–193.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    HANDROW RR, LENZ RW, AX R.L.: Structural comparaisons among glycosaninoglycans to promote an acrosome reaction in bovine spermatozoa. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Comm. 1982, 107: 1326–1332.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    LENZ RW, BALL GD, LOHSE JK, FIRST NL, AX R.L.: Chondrointin sulfate facilitates an acrosome reaction in bovine spermatozoa as evidenced by light microscopy, electron microscopy andin vitro fertilization. Bio. Reprod. 1983, 28: 683–690.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    DAVIS BK, BYRNE R, BEDIGIAN K.: Studies on the mechanism of capacitation: albumin mediated changes in plasma membrane lipids duringin vitro incubation of rat cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1980, 77: 1546–1550.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    ROLDAN ERS, HARRISON RAP.: Molecular mechanisms leading to exocytosis during the sperm acrosome reaction. Fertilization in Mammals. Eds Bavister BD. Cummins JM. et Roland ERP. Plenum Press, New-York, 1990: 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    YANAGIMACHI R.: Mammalian fertilization. In “The physiology of reproduction” edited by Knobil E. Neill J. Raven Press, Ltd New-York, 1988: 135.

    Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    NILES WD, COHEN FS.: Vesicle fusion with planar membranes as a model system of exocytosis. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1991 36: 182–190.

    Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    LANGLAIS J, PLANTE L, BLEAU G, CHAPDELAINE A, ROBERTS KD.: Metabolism of lysophosphatidylcholine in relation to sperm capacitation. Fertil. Steril. 1982, 38: 135–136.

    Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    KOPF GS.: Regulation of sperm function by guanine nucleotide-binding regulatory proteins (G-proteins). In “Meiotoic Inhibition: Molecular Control of Meiosis” Hazeltine, F.P. and First, F.L. (eds), A.R. Liss, New York, 1988, 357–386.

    Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    ROLDAN E.R.S., HARRISON RAP.: Absence of active protein kinase C in ram spermatozoa. Biochem. Biophys. Res Commun. 1989, 155: 901–906.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    ANDERSON RA, FEATHERGILL KA, ZANEVELD LJD.: Evidence for modulation of the human sperm acrosome reaction by G-proteins. J. Androl. Suppl. 1991, 43.

  24. 24.

    BLACKMORE PF, BEEHE SJ, DANFORTH DR, ALEXANDER NJ.: Progesterone and 17-hydroxy-progesterone. Novel stimulators of calcium influx in human sperm. J. Biol. Chem. 1990, 264: 1376–1380.

    Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    SALING PM, STOREY BT.: Mouse gamete interactions during fertilizationin vitro. Chlortetracycline as a fluorescent probe for the mouse acrosome raction. J. Cell. Biol. 1979, 83: 544–552.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    CROZET N, DUMONT M.: The site of the acrosome reaction duringin vivo penetration of the sheep oocyte. Gamete Res. 1984, 10: 97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    CROZET N.: Ultrastrucural aspects ofin vivo fertilization in the cow. Gamete Res. 1984, 10: 241–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    WASSARMAN PM.: Early events in mammalian fertilization. Ann. Rev. Cell. Biol. 1987, 3: 109–115.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    RUSSELL L, PETERSON RN, FREUND M.: Morphologic characteristics of chemically induced acrosome reaction in human spermatozoa. Fertil. Steril. 1979, 32, 87–92.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    SALING PM, STOREY BT.: Mouse gamete interactions during fertilizationin vitro, chlortetracycline as a fluorescent probe for the mouse sperm acrosome reaction. J. Cell. Biol. 1979, 83: 544–555.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    LEE MA, TRUCCO GS, BECHTOL KB, WUMMER N, KOPF GS, BLASCO L, STOREY BT.: Capacitation and acrosome reactions in human spermatozoa monitored by a chlortetracylcine fluorescence assay. Fertil. Steril. 1987, 48: 649–658.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    KOEHLER JK.: Lectins as probes of the spermatozoan surface. Arch. Androl. 1981, 6: 197–218.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    TALBOT P, CHACON R.S.: A new procedure for rapidly scoring acrosome reaction of human sperm. Gamete Research. 1980, 3: 211–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    HOLDEN CA, HYNE RV, SATHANANTHAN AH, TROUNSON AO.: Assessment of human sperm acrosome reaction using concanavalin-A lectin. Molec. Reprod. Develop. 1990, 25: 247–257.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    CROSS NL, MORALES P, OVERSTREET JW, HANSON FW. Two simple methods for detecting acrosome-reacted human sperm. Gamete Res. 1986, 15: 213–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    MENDOZA C, CARRERAS A, MOOS J, TESARIK J. Distinction between true acrosome reaction and degenerative acrosome loss by a one step staining method using Pisum sativum agglutin. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1992, 95: 755–763.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    KALLAJOKI M, VIRTANEN I, SUOMINEN J.: The fate of acrosomal staining during the acrosome reaction of human spermatozoa as revealed by a monoclonal antibody and PNA-lectin. Int. J. Androl. 1986, 9: 181–194.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    MORTIMER D, CURTIS EF, MILLER RG.: Specific labelling by peanut agglutinin of the outer acrosomal membrane of the human spermatozoon. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1987, 81: 127–135.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    WOLF DP, BOLDT J, BYRD W, BECHTOL KB.: Acrosomal status evaluation in human ejaculated sperm with monoclonal antibodies. Biol. Reprod. 1986, 32: 1157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    FENICHEL P, HSI BL, FARAHIFAR D, DONZEAU M, BARRIER-DELPECH D, YEH CJG.: Evaluation of the human sperm acrosome reaction using a monoclonal antibody, GB24, and fluorescence-activated cell sorter. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1989, 87: 699–706.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    TALBOT P, CHACON RS.: A triple-stain technique for evaluating normal acrosome reactions of human sperm. J. Ex. Zool. 1981, 215: 201–208.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    BRAUN J, HIRSCH T, KRAUSE W, ZIEGLER A.: Evaluation of the acrosome reaction using monoclonal antibodies against different acrosomal antigens-comparison with the triple stain techniques. Int. J. Androl. 1991, 14: 431–436.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    OKABE M, MATZO S, NAGIRA M, YING X, KOHAMA Y, MIMURA T.: Collection of acrosome-reacted human sperm using monoclonal antibody-coated paramagnetic beads. Molecul. Reprod. Dev. 1992, 32: 389–393.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    PARINAUD J. VIEITEZ G, LABAL B, RICHOILLEY G.: Selection et micro-injection des spermatozoïdes ayant fait leur réaction acrosomique. Communication aux Journées de Périconceptologie, Toulouse 27–29 Mai 1993.

  45. 45.

    TESARIK J. DRAHORAD J, PEKNICOVA J.: Subcellular immunochemical localisation of acrosin in human spermatozoa during the acrosome reaction and zona pellucida penetration. Fertil. Steril. 1988, 50: 133–140.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    DRAHORAD J, CECHOVA D, TESARIK J.: Activation of proacrosine by a locally produced component of human follicular fluid. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1988, 83: 599–603.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    GOODPASTURE JC, ZAVOS PML, COHEN MR, ZANEVELD LJD.: Relationship of human sperm acrosin and proacrosin to semen parameters. Comparaison between symptomatic men of infertile couples and asymptomatic men, and between different split ejaculates. J. Androl. 1990, 1: 16–27.

    Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    MOHSENIAN M, SYNER FN, MOGHISSI KS.: A study of sperm acrosin in patients with unexplained infertility. Fertil. Steril. 1982, 37: 223–229.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    KOUKOULIS GN, VANTMAN D, DENNISON L, BANKS SM, SHERIN RJ.: Low acrosin in a subgroup of men with idiopathic infertility does not correlate with sperm density percent motility, curvilinear velocity of linearity. Fertil. Steril. 1989, 52: 120–127.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    PERREAULT S, ROGERS BJ.: Capacitation pattern of human spermatozozoa. Fertil. Steril. 1982, 38: 258–260.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    PLACHOT M, MANDELBAUM J, JUNCA AM.: Acrosome reaction of human sperm used forin vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 1984, 42: 418–423.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    PILIKIAN S, MIMOUNI P.: Comparative study of the acrosome reaction and survival of human spermatozoa in various media. Int. J. Androl. 1988, 11: 465–472.

    PubMed  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    MORTIMER D, CURTIS EF, CAMENZIND AR, TANAKA S.: The spontaneous acrosome reaction of human spermatozoain vitro. Hum. Reprod. 1989, 4: 57–62.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    OSMAN RA, ANDRIA ML, JONES AD, MEIZEL S.: Steroid induced exocytosis — the human sperm acrosome reaction. Bioch. Biophys. Res. Comm. 1989: 160.

  55. 55.

    PILIKIAN S, GUERIN JF, ADELEINE P, ECOCHARD R, CZYBA JC.: Spontaneous and ionophore induced acrosome reaction in asthenozoospermic infertile semen. Hum. Reprod. 1992, 7: 991–992.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    FENICHEL P, DONZEAU M, FARAHIFAR D, BASTERIS B, AYRAUD N, HSI BL.: Dynamics of human sperm acrosome reaction, relation within vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 1991, 55: 994–999.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    TESARIK J, MENDOZA C, CARRERAS A.: Fast acrosome reaction measure: a highly sensitive method for evaluating stimulus-induced acrosome. Fertil. Steril. 1993, 59: 424–430.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    JEULIN C, FENEUX D, SERRES C, JOUANNET P, GUILLET-ROSSO, BELAISH-ALLART J, FRYDMAN R, TESTARD J. Sperm factors related to failure of humanin vitro fertilization. J. Reprod. Fertil. 1986, 76: 735–741.

    PubMed  CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    JEYENDRAN RS, VAN DER VEN HH, KENNEDY WP, HEATH E, PEREZ-PELAEZ M, SOBRERO AJ, ZANEFELD LJD.: Acrosomeless sperm, a cause of primary male infertility. Andrologia, 1985, 17: 31–37.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    TOPFER-PEDERSEN E, HEISSLER E, SCHILL WB.: The kinetic of acrosome reaction, an additional sperm parameter. Andrologia, 1985, 17: 24–233.

    Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    CALVO L, VANTMAN D, BANKS SM, TEZON J, KOUKOULIS GN, DENNISON L, SHERINS RJ.: Follicular fluid induced acrosome reaction distinguishes a subgroup of men with unexpained infertility not identified by semen analysis. Fertil. Steril. 1989, 52: 1048–1054.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    TAKAHASHI K, WETZELS MM, GOVERDE HJ, BASTIAANS BA, JANSSEN HJG, ROLLAND R.: The kinetics of the acrosome reaction of human spermatozoa and its correlaiton within vitro fertilization. Fertil. Steril. 1992, 57: 889–894.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Pilikian.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pilikian, S. La réaction acrosomique. Androl. 4, 37–46 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03034618

Download citation

Mots clés

  • Spermatozoïdes humains
  • tests de réaction acrosomique
  • réaction acrosomique
  • fécondationin vitro

Key words

  • Human spermatozoa
  • acrosome raction tests
  • acrosome reaction — in vitro fertilization