|
Vit D (ng/mL)
|
Normozoospermic bull
|
Asthenozoospermic bull
|
|---|
|
0
|
5
|
10
|
50
|
0
|
5
|
10
|
50
|
|---|
|
Total Motility*(%)
|
71.26 ± 2.83
|
65.58 ± 2.06
|
74.95 ± 9.75
|
82.68 ± 4.75
|
41.83 ± 12.37
|
60.60 ± 6.14
|
52.50 ± 2.45
|
48.30 ± 3.29
|
|
Progressive motility*(%)
|
53.90 ± 1.14a
|
52.40 ± 1.44a
|
55.63 ± 5.38a
|
65.39 ± 1.56b
|
20.52 ± 2.62 A
|
31.53 ± 0.86B
|
32.29 ± 1.33B
|
31.08 ± 0.14B
|
|
Immotile*(%)
|
28.74 ± 2.83
|
34.42 ± 2.06
|
25.05 ± 9.75
|
22.03 ± 0.64
|
58.17 ± 12.37
|
39.40 ± 6.14
|
47.50 ± 2.45
|
51.70 ± 3.29
|
|
Viability (%)
|
54.33 ± 1.76a
|
52.00 ± 0.58a
|
56.33 ± 3.28ab
|
63.00 ± 2.00b
|
57.00 ± 3.06B
|
45.67 ± 2.96AB
|
37.67 ± 4.26 A
|
41.00 ± 5.00 A
|
- Data are expressed as means ± SEM. a,b A, B Means in a row, with different capital alphabetic letters are significantly different P < 0.05
- * The effect of different concentration of vitamin D in normozoospermic bulls is significantly higher than asthenozoospermic bulls