Table 4 Comparison of pregnancy outcomes between patients who underwent ICSI using frozen/thawed sperm, in the antegrade ejaculation group (n=4) and surgical (n=4) groups
Antegrade | Surgical | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Patient No | 1 | 11 | 12 | 18 | 3 | 5 | 6 | 8 |
Fresh cycles with frozen/thawed sperm | ||||||||
Duration I-SR (y) | 10 | na | 12 | 19 | 12 | 2 | 7 | <1 |
Care duration | 1 | 2 | 1 | 3 | 1 | <1 | <1 | 1 |
Partner’s age(y) | 22 | 29 | 32 | 36 | 35 | 20 | 28 | 22 |
No of ICSI cycle(s) | 2 | 5 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 |
No of follicules retreived | 5/10 | 10/12/16/18/19 | 6/5 | 6/10/16 | 6/6 | 9 | 14 | 25/18 |
No of injected oocyte(s) | 1/8 | 1/6/9/11/11 | 2/2 | 5/5/6 | 6/5 | 6 | 9 | 15/15 |
No of zygote(s) | 1/5 | 0/2/3/7/4 | 1/2 | 4/3/5 | 6/1 | 5 | 6 | 0/11 |
Fertilization rate % | 100/63 | 0/33/33/64/18 | 50/100 | 80/60/83 | 100/20 | 83 | 56 | 0/73 |
No of embryos obtained | 1/4 | 0/2/3/7/4 | 1/2 | 4/3/5 | 4/1 | 5 | 6 | 0/11 |
Clivage rate % | 100/80 | 0/100/100/100/100 | 100/100 | 100/100/100 | 67/100 | 100 | 100 | 0/100 |
No of embryo(s) transferred | 1/2 | 0/2/2/2/3 | 1/2 | 2/2/3 | 2/1 | 1 | 1 | 0/2 |
No of frozen embryo(s) | 0/2 | 0/0/0/5/1 | 0/0 | 2/0/3 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 0/0 |
Pregnancy | 1/0 | 0 | 0/1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Birth | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 |
Cycles using cryopreserved embryo(s) | ||||||||
No of thawed embryo(s) | 5/1 | 2/0/0 | 1 | |||||
No of embryo(s) transferred | 1/1 | 1 | 1 | |||||
No of embryo(s) left | 0 | 3 | 2 | |||||
Pregnancy | 0 | 0 | 1 | |||||
Birth | 0 | 0 | 1 |