Skip to main content
  • Mouvements du spermatozoide et analyse automatisée
  • Published:

Place de l’analyse du mouvement dans un bilan de fertilité: Valeurs prédictives des différents paramètres mesurés

Interest of sperm movement analysis in investigation of male infertility

Resume

La fonction flagellaire est directement impliquée dans la rencontre des spermatozoïdes avec l’ovocyte et dans le processus de fécondation.

Les systèmes actuels d’analyse du mouvement spermatique permettent d’effectuer des mesures très rapides, qui pourraient en théorie être proposées à l’occasion de tout spermogramme. Néanmoins, les analyses de régression multiple montrent que si beaucoup de paramètres sont informatifs, ils le sont moins que certaines caractéristiques traditionnelles du spermogramme, comme le % de formes normales et le % de spermatozoïdes mobiles. Aussi, il nous paraît plus judicieux de sélectionner les indications de ce type d’analyse, comme un contexte de stérilité inexpliquée ou d'échec de FIV, afin de proposer la démarche thérapeutique la mieux adaptée; ainsi, une dyskinésie flagellaire révélée par une valeur très basse de l’amplitude latérale de la tête, ou par une vitesse de progression linéaire abaissée, représentera une bonne indication pour une technique de micro-injection, plutôt qu’une FIV traditionnelle.

Abstract

Routine evaluation of semen characteristics-spermiogram-includes estimation of the percentage of motile sperm; however it does not provide quantitative informations about sperm movement characteristics, except under the form of qualitative appreciations (slow, sluggish, yawing, non progressive, etc.). Flagellar function is indeed directly involved in the migration of spermatozoa through the female genital tract, and in the fertilization process by itself (migration through the zona pellucida requires special motility state, generally called “hyperactivation”). Sperm flagellar movements can now be indirectly investigated by analysing movements of sperm head, which are more easily detectable under phase contrast illumination: video signals are digitalized then sperm tracks are reconstructed by the computer from coordinates of sperm centroids (these systems are called “computer-assisted semen analysis” or “CASA”).

CASA systems are now so performing and rapid that sperm movement analysis (SMA) can be proposed in the same time of routine semen analysis. However SMA, together with other functional tests, offer more interest in some particular situations as unexplained infertility, or unexpected failure of IVF.

Numerous studies have tried to identify the most discriminant parameters, generally by means of multiple regression analysis. The interpretation of litterature data is difficult because of several differences in the protocol design, concerning either the measurements conditions (before or after sperm washing and selection) or the nature of the functional test: migration into cervical mucus, zona-free hamster egg penetration, IVF, etc. Moreover, the most discriminant factors are generally represented by classical parameters as % of normal forms or of motile sperm. In the present study we showed that only the factor “% of motility” allowed a significant discrimination according to different classes of fertilization rate (FR) in an IVF system. FR increased with hyperactivation rate (HA), but the statistical test was not significant. However, the more numerous cases of IVF failure were found in the group corresponding to very low HA rate (0–5%). We conclude that one major interest of SMA is to reveal some flagellar dyskinesia (i.e. corresponding to low values of amplitude lateral displacement of the head, or straight line velocity). These cases could then benefit of assisted reproductive techniques well adapted to this motion dysfunction, as subzonal insemination (SUZI) or intra-cytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI).

References

  1. Aitken R.J., Best F.S.M., Richardson D.W., et al.: An analysis of sperm function in cases of unexplained infertility: conventional criteria, movement characteristics, and fertilizing capacity. Fertil Steril. 1982, 38: 212–221.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Aitken R.J., Buckingham D., Harkiss D.: Analysis of the extent to which sperm movement can predict the results of ionophore — enhanced functional assays of the acrosome reaction and sperm — ovocyte fusion — Hum. Reprod., 1994, 9: 1867–1874.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan S.Y.W., Wang C., Chan S.T.H., et al.: Predictive value of sperm morphology and movement characteristics in the outcome of in vitro fertilization of human oocytes. Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer. 1989, 6: 142–148.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Feneux D., Serres C., Jouannet P.: Sliding spermatozoa: a dyskinesia responsable for human infertility. Fertil Steril., 1985, 44: 508–511.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ginsburg K.A., Sacco A.G., Ager J.W., Moghissi K.S.: Variation of movement characteristics with washing and capacitation of spermatozoa. Multivariate statistical analysis and prediction of sperm penetrating ability. Fertil. Steril., 1990: 704–708.

  6. Holt W.V., Moore H.D.M., Hillier S.G.: Computer-assisted measurement of sperm swimming speed in human semen: correlation of results with in vitro fertilization assays. Fertil Steril. 1985, 44: 112–119.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeulin C., Feneux D., Jouannet P., et al.: Sperm factors related to failure of human in vitro fertilization. J. Reprod Fertil, 76: 735–744.

  8. Liu D.Y., Clarke G.N., Bzker H.W.G. (1991): Relationship between sperm motility assessed with the hamilton-thorn motility analyzer and fertilization rates in vitro. J. androl, 12: 231–239.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lornage J., Mathieu C., Regnier-Vigouroux G., Guerin J.F., Pinatel M.C., Boulieu D.: In vitro fertilization for male infertility: predictive value of sperm movement parameters on the cleavage rate. 7è Congrès Mondial de fécondation in vitro et procréations Médicalement assistées. Paris, Juillet 1991.

  10. Mak C., Van Kooij R.J., Eimers J.M., Te Velde E.R.: Human sperm movement asessed with the hamilton-thorn mobility analyser and in vitro fertilization. andrologia, 1994, 26: 323–329.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Parinaud J., Vieitez G., Moutaffian H., Richoilley G., Labal B.: Relevance of acrosome function in the evaluation of semen in in-vitro fertilizing ability. Fertil-Steril., 1995: in press.

  12. Vautman D., Banks S.M., Koukoulis G., Dennisin L., Sherins R.J.: Assessment of sperm motion characteristics from fertile and infertile men using a fully automated computer — assisted semen analyser. Fertil-Steril., 1989, 51: 156–161.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang C., Lee G.S., Leung A., Surrey E.S., Chan S.Y.W.: Human sperm hyperactivation and acrosome reaction and their relationship to human in vitro fertilization. Fertil-Steril., 1993, 56: 1221–1227.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Guerin, J.F., Lornage, J., Cordonier, H. et al. Place de l’analyse du mouvement dans un bilan de fertilité: Valeurs prédictives des différents paramètres mesurés. Androl. 5, 46–52 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03034302

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03034302

Mots-clés

Key words